Skip to content

Programme Conference of the German Judges’ Academy draws up ambitious position paper on judicial training

Bet­ween June 2011 and June 2012, a working group com­mis­sio­ned by the Pro­gram­me Con­fe­rence of the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Aca­de­my deve­lo­ped an 80-page posi­ti­on paper on the ques­ti­on “What con­sti­tu­tes good trai­ning?”. The paper, which was unani­mously adopted by the Pro­gram­me Con­fe­rence in Wies­ba­den in ear­ly June 2012, ana­ly­ses the life cycle of good judi­cial trai­ning across six chap­ters, ran­ging from the assess­ment of trai­ning needs through the plan­ning of the annu­al pro­gram­me and indi­vi­du­al con­fe­ren­ces to qua­li­ty assu­rance fol­lo­wing the com­ple­ti­on of trai­ning mea­su­res. The ana­ly­sis cul­mi­na­tes in 36 pro­gram­ma­tic the­ses out­lining the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Academy’s over­all stra­tegy; while many of the­se reflect the pre­do­mi­nant­ly very good sta­tus quo, an equal­ly lar­ge num­ber are inten­ded to chart the path towards even bet­ter and more effi­ci­ent trai­ning for jud­ges and public pro­se­cu­tors at the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Aca­de­my. The posi­ti­on paper, which was published in Sep­tem­ber 2012 in a pro­fes­sio­nal print ver­si­on with the assis­tance of Diez Pri­son and in Novem­ber 2012 under the title “What Con­sti­tu­tes Good Fur­ther Trai­ning?” in an equal­ly modern English-language ver­si­on – trans­la­ted under the lea­der­ship of the Lan­guage Ser­vice of the Fede­ral Minis­try of Jus­ti­ce – is roun­ded off by a com­pre­hen­si­ve appen­dix. Here, rea­ders can find out, abo­ve all, about the legal frame­work of the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Aca­de­my. The admi­nis­tra­ti­ve agree­ment bet­ween the Fede­ral Govern­ment and the Län­der on the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Aca­de­my of 1 March 1993 is repro­du­ced here, as is the com­pre­hen­si­ve coll­ec­tion of for­mal reso­lu­ti­ons from the Pro­gram­me Con­fe­rence of the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Academy.

Both the Ger­man and Eng­lish ver­si­ons of the paper, which have met with gre­at inte­rest from tho­se respon­si­ble for judi­cial trai­ning in Ger­ma­ny and abroad sin­ce their publi­ca­ti­on, can be ope­ned as PDF docu­ments by cli­cking on the rele­vant link on the right-hand side and then studied.

Down­loads

Programme Conference of the German Judges’ Academy draws up ambitious position paper on judicial training

Bet­ween June 2011 and June 2012, a working group com­mis­sio­ned by the Pro­gram­me Con­fe­rence of the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Aca­de­my deve­lo­ped an 80-page posi­ti­on paper on the ques­ti­on “What con­sti­tu­tes good trai­ning?”. The paper, which was unani­mously adopted by the Pro­gram­me Con­fe­rence in Wies­ba­den in ear­ly June 2012, ana­ly­ses the life cycle of good judi­cial trai­ning across six chap­ters, ran­ging from the assess­ment of trai­ning needs through the plan­ning of the annu­al pro­gram­me and indi­vi­du­al con­fe­ren­ces to qua­li­ty assu­rance fol­lo­wing the com­ple­ti­on of trai­ning mea­su­res. The ana­ly­sis cul­mi­na­tes in 36 pro­gram­ma­tic the­ses out­lining the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Academy’s over­all stra­tegy; while many of the­se reflect the pre­do­mi­nant­ly very good sta­tus quo, an equal­ly lar­ge num­ber are inten­ded to chart the path towards even bet­ter and more effi­ci­ent trai­ning for jud­ges and public pro­se­cu­tors at the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Aca­de­my. The posi­ti­on paper, which was published in Sep­tem­ber 2012 in a pro­fes­sio­nal print ver­si­on with the assis­tance of Diez Pri­son and in Novem­ber 2012 under the title “What Con­sti­tu­tes Good Fur­ther Trai­ning?” in an equal­ly modern English-language ver­si­on – trans­la­ted under the lea­der­ship of the Lan­guage Ser­vice of the Fede­ral Minis­try of Jus­ti­ce – is roun­ded off by a com­pre­hen­si­ve appen­dix. Here, rea­ders can find out, abo­ve all, about the legal frame­work of the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Aca­de­my. The admi­nis­tra­ti­ve agree­ment bet­ween the Fede­ral Govern­ment and the Län­der on the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Aca­de­my of 1 March 1993 is repro­du­ced here, as is the com­pre­hen­si­ve coll­ec­tion of for­mal reso­lu­ti­ons from the Pro­gram­me Con­fe­rence of the Ger­man Jud­ges’ Academy.

Both the Ger­man and Eng­lish ver­si­ons of the paper, which have met with gre­at inte­rest from tho­se respon­si­ble for judi­cial trai­ning in Ger­ma­ny and abroad sin­ce their publi­ca­ti­on, can be ope­ned as PDF docu­ments by cli­cking on the rele­vant link on the right-hand side and then studied.

Down­loads